Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He's also not a journalist by traditional definitions i.e. no formal training, no accreditation, no redaction to protect innocent parties, no protection of sources.

He's more akin to an activist.



Journalists consider Julian to be a journalist.

> WikiLeaks wins top Australian journalism prize... The Walkley Award is one of a number of journalism prizes won by WikiLeaks in recent years, including Amnesty International’s UK Media Award and the acclaimed Martha Gellhorn Prize. The latter award is given to journalists who reveal “an unpalatable truth that exposes establishment propaganda.” These prizes undermine the Obama administration’s claims that Assange is not a journalist and that the publication of thousands of secret US diplomatic and military cables is illegal.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2011/11/assa-n30.html


Hmm, this is the definition — https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/journali...

> a person who writes news stories or articles for a newspaper or magazine or broadcasts them on radio or television


By your own definition this doesn't apply to Assange.

Simply dumping files on a website doesn't make you a journalist and US courts agree.


This is 'a' definition.

Cambridge.org needs to wake up.

The various yt auditors around - especially in the US - all class themselves as journalists.


I am a trillionaire.

Saying it doesnt make it true.


The law doesn't care about "traditional definitions". Anyone in the US can act as a journalist by simply publishing.


> He's also not a journalist by traditional definitions

The year is 2024 and we've had the internet for a good while now.

I think it's safe to say that "tradition definitions" are long, long dead and we need to get on with what the reality actually is.

Who cares what "journalists" were defined as in 1980.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: