> Wouldn't it be better to generate multiple tracks that can be mixed / tweaked together, rather than a single track? That way you can also keep the parts you like and continue iterating on the parts you dislike.
That'd interest me (a musical hobbyist) more than the "whole track" generators, for sure.
I imagine it's a harder task tho'. Presumably, if you give the same source material (video, prompt) to the AI multiple times, it will generate different pieces of music. So if you do a series of prompts, each one specifying a different instrument or group/bus, then you (or the AI) need to arrange for the parts to blend correctly, follow the same cues and assemble to a coherent arrangement. Is that one pass with multiple outputs, or multiple passes/prompts with one output each?
I have got the impression (from casual reading) that the music generators don't inherently "know" about different parts of a piece of music. They just know about the final output.
That'd interest me (a musical hobbyist) more than the "whole track" generators, for sure.
I imagine it's a harder task tho'. Presumably, if you give the same source material (video, prompt) to the AI multiple times, it will generate different pieces of music. So if you do a series of prompts, each one specifying a different instrument or group/bus, then you (or the AI) need to arrange for the parts to blend correctly, follow the same cues and assemble to a coherent arrangement. Is that one pass with multiple outputs, or multiple passes/prompts with one output each?
I have got the impression (from casual reading) that the music generators don't inherently "know" about different parts of a piece of music. They just know about the final output.