No idea on wording, i also don't have much experience in this space so don't take my comment as critique. Rather just an observation from a uninformed user hah. It does seem the wording was my only issue.
> Also, would you prefer having less jobs shown, but with a minimum $100k salary if it's a range?
I don't think the range matters to be honest, but i do think "breaking" the range erodes confidence and/or increases confusion on the user side. Ie the page explicitly told me no posts less than 100k (iirc), but then showed some less than 100k - so confusion/etc.
> Regarding the vetted aspect, it's related to the fact some companies aren't actively recruiting (you can read more in the article linked in the About page of the website).
Sounds good! If i'm indicative of the "average user" you may want to make that aspect more prominent? But i could also be well under your target user, in which case ignore my ignorance :D
Cool site! I hope to use it one day when i'm looking!
It's true that it may confuse a user if they see a salary range outside what's advertised. I modified the logic so from now for new jobs, the min salary must be $100k+ minimum. Thank you!
> Also, would you prefer having less jobs shown, but with a minimum $100k salary if it's a range?
I don't think the range matters to be honest, but i do think "breaking" the range erodes confidence and/or increases confusion on the user side. Ie the page explicitly told me no posts less than 100k (iirc), but then showed some less than 100k - so confusion/etc.
> Regarding the vetted aspect, it's related to the fact some companies aren't actively recruiting (you can read more in the article linked in the About page of the website).
Sounds good! If i'm indicative of the "average user" you may want to make that aspect more prominent? But i could also be well under your target user, in which case ignore my ignorance :D
Cool site! I hope to use it one day when i'm looking!