Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That really, really depends.

My stepdaughter was involved in a he-said, she-said collision in a lighted intersection. "I believe I had the green light", "no, I believe I had".

So me, thinking, talking to insurer, "While not definitive, if the EDR shows that she was a complete stop for 30s before moving, that might show she was stopped at a red, and then went when it turned green".

Insurer: unless we're looking at six digits in a claim, we're not pulling EDR data.

They did treat it as a not-at-fault collision, because fault could not be determined, but still.

Tesla will make you fight them to get access to your own EDR data. But will hold press conferences where they'll tell the world all about your EDR data if they think it will move the spotlight away from AP/FSD (fatal accident a few years ago where they were suspected to be involved. Tesla holds a press conference, "Akshually, the vehicle had told the driver to be more attentive". And it had. But Tesla didn't mention that it had only done that once. And that that one time was EIGHTEEN MINUTES prior to the collision. They just wanted to make it sound like an irresponsible driver.)



> Insurer: unless we're looking at six digits in a claim, we're not pulling EDR data.

Fascinating. You'd think that would be the first thing used before any humans even speak.


It's also a gamble. Money and labor to retrieve the data, possibly out of a seriously damaged vehicle (making it difficult to get to it). And then if you're in a situation where EDR is your best source of verifiability (no eyewitnesses, etc.) you're also gambling that the story coming from your customer was accurate and doesn't increase the liability that you've helpfully provided evidence of.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: