Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

How do you suppose the nearly global cloud seeding effort to artificially form clouds is impacting shifting weather patters?



Can you supply some details (or better, references) to what you're talking about? Because without them, this sounds completely detached from reality.


At least in some parts of the world and at least a year ago the chemtrail-cloud seeding ramped up considerably.

Dane Wiginton (https://www.instagram.com/DaneWigington) is the founder of GeoengineerWatch.org as a very deep resource.

They have a free documentary called "The Dimming" you can watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf78rEAJvhY

In the documentary it includes credible witness testimonies such as politicians including a previous Minister of Defense for Canada; multiple states in the US have ban the spraying now - with more to follow, and the testimony and data provided there will be arguably be the most recent.

Here's a video on a "comedy" show from 5 years ago - there is a more recent appearance but I can't find it - in attempt to make light of it, without having an actual discussion with critical thinking or debate so people can be enlightened with the actual problems and potential problems and harms it can cause, to keep them none the wiser - it's just propaganda while trying to minimize: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOfm5xYgiK0

A few of the problems cloud seeding will cause: - flooding in regions due to rain pattern changes - drought in areas due to rain pattern changes - cloud cover (amount of sun) changes crop yields - this harms local economies of farmers, impacting smaller farming operations more who's risk isn't spread out - potentially forcing them to sell or go into savings or go bankrupt, etc.

There are also very serious concerns/claims made of what exactly they are spraying - which includes aluminium nanoparticles, which can/would mean: - at a certain soil concentration of aluminium plants stop bearing fruit, - aluminium is a fire accelerant and so forest fires will then 1) more easily catch, and 2) more easily-quickly spread due to their increased intensity

Of course discussion on this is heavily suppressed in the mainstream, instead of having deep-thorough conversation with actual experts to present their cases - the label of conspiracy theorists or the idea of "detached from reality" are people's knee-jerk reactions often; and where propaganda can convince them of the "save the planet" narrative, which could also be a cover story for those toeing the line following orders supporting potentially very nefarious plans - doing it blindly because they think they're helping fight "climate change."

There are plenty of accounts on social media that are keeping track of and posting daily of the cloud seeding operations: https://www.instagram.com/p/CjNjAROPFs0/ - a couple testimonies.


Real question: Is aluminum a practical danger in this way, or is it more like the Manhattan Project team not sure if they would set the atmosphere on fire? Is aluminum the best option?


It's in part a fire accelerant, it wouldn't turn the atmosphere on fire.

If there is a top secret Manhattan Project for "climate change" - then someone's very likely pulling a fast one over everyone toeing that line, someone who has ulterior motives, misleading people to do their bidding.

But sure, fair question - a public discussion would allow actual experts to discuss the merits of what they're doing, and perhaps find a better solution than what has gained traction.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: