Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Looks like a moderator downweighted it, probably because it's a sensational-indignant article, which is not what HN is supposed to be for.

Angry articles about how awful rich people or celebrities are a sure hit with upvoters, but their appeal does not come from intellectual curiosity, which is the organizing principle of this site (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...). So it's standard moderation practice to downweight them here; otherwise the front page would consist of little else.

We make exceptions if an article has significant new information (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...) that can provide a basis for an intellectually curious conversation, but it doesn't look like that's the case here.

Edit: it's also the case that users heavily flagged it, which has a similar effect. I'm not sure whether the moderation chicken or the user eggs were first in the downranking of this piece, but it doesn't matter much in the sense that both are the system functioning as usual.



> their appeal does not come from intellectual curiosity

Unless you're interested in human behavior and see finance as part of a natural process. From a biology perspective there's an obvious line of thinking around resource sequestration you can't really discuss in public, so I'm always interested in seeing the shape its eventual expression takes.

The articles are also rage bait and I agree with the moderation fwiw. We aren't really here to square this particular circle.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: