Women get surgery to get bigger boobs, primarily as a looks thing.
Are we at the stage of inserting silicone in your junk so your jock strap looks better?
(Please note you can just pad your bra if you want to look busty fully clothed. And it leaves scars, so I'm skeptical of the value it has for looking good naked or in teeny, tiny bikinis.)
Appologies, I glossed over the word "into" from your comment. Packers are not implanted. Penile implants exist but are typically done for medical reasons (like you've fucked up your junk by jelqing). The closest thing to female breast implants is male pec implants. I'd argue Synthol is similar too, though less invasive.
My general understanding is that phallus enlargement is intended to enhance sexual pleasure whereas breast enlargement has no such function and from what I gather likely reduces sexual pleasure for the woman.
But I don't have a phallus, haven't seen one in ages and I'm perfectly happy to be educated on the topic by actual penis-having peoples more in the know than little ole me.
I know one of the major risks of enlargement is impotence, and like with breast enlargement I can't imagine jamming a bunch of non-nerve things in there improving sexual pleasure.
I'm no expert on the subject, but I've always thought people primarily got them to look better with maybe some hope of performing better for their partner. I've never thought they were for their pleasure, except in the same way as breast enlargement where you enjoy pleasing your partner.
Still, I think a better comparison is "men get hair treatments, primarily as a looks thing."
Yeah its shit in the name of a bigger biceps and a bigger junk, I don't see how that is any better?