Every liberal democracy subscribes to the idea of civilian control of the military, so the distinction between civilian leadership and the military they oversee isn't a new or foreign concept.
Why would you assume MoD use = IDF use? Do you also assume everything the DoD contracts for is used by the U.S. Army?
I also suspect that almost everything to do with actual military operations - intelligence, logistics, targeting, whatever - would be classified, and therefore could not run on civilian infrastructure.
Every liberal democracy subscribes to the idea of civilian control of the military, so the distinction between civilian leadership and the military they oversee isn't a new or foreign concept.
Why would you assume MoD use = IDF use? Do you also assume everything the DoD contracts for is used by the U.S. Army?