> I also am OK for 100% tax to anyone who's not me or my immediate family.

Then your money wouldn't be worth anything as no one will want to provide you with a service.

> Basically you are ok for death penalty strictly for other people? Seems quite convenient :D

Come on. Your objection is meaningless distraction, because it's so general it's an objection to any kind of punishment of anyone proposed by anyone who isn't themselves guilty.

Not really, if I am OK with death penalty for manslaughter, I put myself at risk (or someone I love) to be at the receiving end of that law: it happens to people without really wanting it.

On the other hand, becoming billionaire is both extremely hard, bordering impossible for most people, and it's also an active choice someone who's not already billionaire can make on their way there (so they can always be just enough away from being a billionaire).

That's why to me it's like being in favor for a law against martians: it really doesn't concern anyone of us, so who cares?

Oh, so you're saying tivert is only in favor of the death penalty for billionaire fraudsters because tivert isn't a billionnaire, not because tivert isn't, and doesn't plan to become a billionaire fraudster?

But how do you know? Is the idea that a billionaire wouldn't be posting to HackerNews?

> That's why to me it's like being in favor for a law against martians: it really doesn't concern anyone of us, so who cares?

What do you mean? A billionaire committing massive fraud definitely concerns us.