Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Who says it must answer in a way that makes everybody happy?


Well, that's the point of the article, right? Whenever ChatGPT / Gemini say the "wrong" thing, their parent company gets negative publicity. And there's nothing these companies dread more than bad publicity.


All they need to do is pair it with a simple click-through disclaimer. Then they would be justified in dismissing any bad publicity. I mean, is anyone dumb enough to think they would lose business over such a thing?

Infantilization isn't the solution.


Exactly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: