Had no clue of the original quote, hah. Thanks for letting me know! :)
And I especially agree with the multi-core comment. We need filesystems as full-blown ACID databases, like 10 years ago now.
Surely it can't be so difficult to have a K/V store with ACID semantics and give it a filesystem emulation layer so people can use all the normal coreutils like `ls` and `cd` etc. But then also add a little extra API that allows for locking, transactions and all the good stuff?
And I especially agree with the multi-core comment. We need filesystems as full-blown ACID databases, like 10 years ago now.
Surely it can't be so difficult to have a K/V store with ACID semantics and give it a filesystem emulation layer so people can use all the normal coreutils like `ls` and `cd` etc. But then also add a little extra API that allows for locking, transactions and all the good stuff?
Will nobody step up?...