Watch the closing remarks, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttrJd2aWF-Y it is sho...

starik36 · on Jan 27, 2024

It's remarks by the plaintiff's attorney meant to elicit emotion. It includes zero context. Who died - were they militants with guns? Were they civilian casualties of war? No one knows. Just a bizarre connection between Bethlehem and Gaza. Bethlehem is not in Gaza.

I am not sure what facts I am supposed to gather from this.

nerpderp82 · on Jan 27, 2024

Of course it was, those were the closing remarks. You can watch the full speech which gives you the argument spelled out.

Or read South Africa's case https://www.icj-cij.org/case/192

Ms Ní Ghrálaigh's pedigree in addressing genocide is extensive, as mentioned in the linked article.

One can only counter misdirection with facts. There is a Zionist genocide of Palestinians going on right now in Gaza.

starik36 · on Jan 27, 2024

The court said no such thing. Don't spread misinformation.

nerpderp82 · on Jan 29, 2024

I didn't say that court said, "There is a Zionist genocide of Palestinians going on right now in Gaza." I did.

My comment was asking you to read the original sources, you are twisting my words.