What? Most of this website LOVES that book lol. Every single thread is full of people basically using it to confirm their biais, even if as the other commenter said it hasn't held up to scrutiny.
It's also full of people debunking it (or trying). So why single out the people who like it, as if there is no opposition?
Also, people posted studies that are both positive and negative towards Bullshit Jobs. How do you reconsile this? Personally I think it means his theories are not outright madness and have merit, and it's hard to reason about just like with other social studies.
Communist and anarchist LARPers are never honest, that is why they live in capitalist societies and not their desired form of society wherever they exist.
Another reminder, its never about equality as they claim, its about power, it always is.
Some people do still live in actual "primitive" tribes or bands. It's been a successful model of human organization for thousands of years, and perhaps the closest wrt. real-world feasibility to what one could call anarchism.
