Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think you misunderstand - there are no other app stores. Only different payment processors.


Maybe I misunderstood the whole point of this.

This whole lawsuit is because Epic wanted to avoid the Apple Tax by processing in-game purchases via their own payment provider, bypassing Apple App Store or Apple Pay or whatever other thing Apple forces everyone to use on iOS.

So Epic is now allowed to use their own payment processer for in-game purchases, but Apple is saying that they will still have to pay the Apple Tax for those purchases.

In this case the "store" is not an app store but an in-game store, sure.

Have I got that right so far?


> This whole lawsuit is because Epic wanted to avoid the Apple Tax

That may be, but that's not what the court ruled. The court ruled in favor of Epic on only one count of ten - specifically that Apple must allow other payment processors.

As long as the app was originally installed via the Apple App Store, it's still subject to the Apple Tax.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: