Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> No, that was not the issue, and "crashing" was never on the table.

That’s the difference it makes. They were preventing “crashes”. Apple want to you have a working phone so that they can sell you services. They extended the lives of out-of-warranty phones with degraded batteries. They are known for having industry leading support periods for their phones and this is no different.

People like my wife didn’t care that her phone was slower. She cared that it worked. She never bothered to change the battery. She just upgraded when she would have anyway.

I noticed today that her iPhone 8 is in a throttled state. She doesn’t care.

Should they have told the user? Sure. Should they have to pay enormous amounts of money for extending the lives of old hardware? No. Especially when the other manufacturers let their phones rot. Literally doing nothing would have made apple better off and driven more sales due to rebooting handsets.



Maybe they'll tell me what's going on next time. That'd be nice.

It's also nice that your wife doesn't mind. That doesn't scale, though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: