Then people should use those languages. From the beginning Go has been about simplicity and utility, not about providing multiple patterns and alternate syntax.
I would also argue that repetitive code is a failure of the engineer who implemented it. If writing code is repetitive then people may want to look into generating it instead.
I would also argue that repetitive code is a failure of the engineer who implemented it. If writing code is repetitive then people may want to look into generating it instead.