> While two of the robots were disabled so that the engineer and his crew could work on the machines, a third was inadvertently left on — resulting in the attack two years ago, witnesses told the Information....
> The injury was apparently not severe enough to require the employee to take time off from work.
A two-year-old injury caused by not shutting off machinery under maintenance that wasn't severe enough to require time off gets described as an "attack"? I'm a strong advocate for holding companies to account for how they treat workers but this feels like barrel-scraping.
Indeed, in a pause between meteorite catastrophic extinction and climate disaster we are all waiting for, newspapers do the best to keep your attention to serious threads
