Can you not just write it from the paper(s)? Or is that more effort than value to you?
> that translating eg. GPL Python or C++ into C would mean the license is retained
It depends a bit on what exactly "translating" means but you could easily be a derivative work.
Honestly in that situation I wouldn't even look at the code. You might use in to test equivalent behavior after you have your own implementation, but only in a gross sense.
I think I have to look at the code when using other people's MIT licensed code... If they have used something that's GPL or used someone else's code that turns out to be GPL, then it becomes my problem when translating it. And I'm not smart enough to just follow a paper
Ha! I've translated your YIN code actually! Your autocorrelation is pretty cool - GPL versions all use an additional FFT. Have been struggling with your PYIN implementation because the beta distribution is copied from the GPL PYIN source, and the paper just references its source code for that part, and as you also found out, it's not a real beta distribution. I asked one of the PYIN authors (Dixon) if he were willing to change the license and he forwarded my mail a week ago - haven't heard back. Then there's the absolute_threshold function that is the same as in the PYIN source where it says "using Jorgen Six'es loop construct". This "loop construct" doesn't have a license, because he doesn't answer the issues about that in his TarsosDSP library, and I'm not sure if I should bother him about a few lines of code. I'm assuming it's a coincidence and that's just a normal way to find the absolute threshold. I really don't want to point fingers here, I'm being paranoid because I try to make sure I don't publish something that can put people in trouble...
So I have been staring at your code for many hours, and the YIN-implementation works well. The PYIN on the other hand.. well I necro posted a while ago in one of your pull requests I think ;)
It sounds like you’ve found it already but th original pYin implementation is in the VAMP plugin. Simon Dixon is my PhD supervisor but he’s quite busy. Feel free to email me questions in my the meantime. j.x.riley@ the same university as Simon. There’s also a Python implementation in the librosa library which might have a better license for your purposes.
> that translating eg. GPL Python or C++ into C would mean the license is retained
It depends a bit on what exactly "translating" means but you could easily be a derivative work.
Honestly in that situation I wouldn't even look at the code. You might use in to test equivalent behavior after you have your own implementation, but only in a gross sense.