What I read (did not verify) was that two users discussed and decided on the feature. That's hardly a well deliberated change.
I think for user facing features it makes more sense to provide new behaviors as opt-in, and go through a longer RFC period. Only if and when the new behavior is widely used and popular, then you flip the switch to default.
I think for user facing features it makes more sense to provide new behaviors as opt-in, and go through a longer RFC period. Only if and when the new behavior is widely used and popular, then you flip the switch to default.