It's literally an argument about guns. The poster literally said pictures of dead kids wouldn't change their minds, and then made pro-gun comments.
On a thread that was supposed to be about how guns are so political that no one will ever change their minds.
That was my point. I don't care if they argued with logic.
They were making the point for op by just entirely skipping past the original argument (gun is political and no one is changing their minds) to talk about their stance on guns.
To me, politically encamped means that you have decided upon a viewpoint without much thought. You sway one way because it's the position of your "camp" or tribe. And because of that you won't change your mind.
"pictures of dead kids wouldn't change their minds" does not necessarily fit the definition of political encampment. If they won't change their mind because it would go against their party's line then they are being political. If they won't change their mind because they believe their stance is correct (based on logic, facts, morality, etc) and/or the other alternatives are wrong (based on logic, facts, morality, etc) then that is not political.
I guess your saw encampment in the GP's comment? I didn't.
On a thread that was supposed to be about how guns are so political that no one will ever change their minds.
That was my point. I don't care if they argued with logic.
They were making the point for op by just entirely skipping past the original argument (gun is political and no one is changing their minds) to talk about their stance on guns.
That was my point. I think maybe you missed it?