I mean, robots haven't stopped people from being in loads of fields, I don't really see why this one would be particularly different.
What they do mostly-consistently do is lower the cost floor. Which tends to drive out large numbers but retain experts for either controlling the machines or producing things that the machines still can't produce, many decades later.
What they do mostly-consistently do is lower the cost floor. Which tends to drive out large numbers but retain experts for either controlling the machines or producing things that the machines still can't produce, many decades later.