Looks like a cool product with the front-end integration but looking at the license, I can't understand how I'm supposed to use it when you use an Elastic license.
While I understand Elastic's goal of preventing other companies from just rebranding Elasticsearch and selling it as it is, I would probably use Nango as it is and build a front-end layer on top of it for my side projects as I thought this is the main use-case. Can you elaborate more on the license?
(Nango co-founder here) We use the Elastic license precisely for the reason you mention: to prevent companies from rebranding Nango and selling it as it is. For all other use cases, it should be accessible.
So let's say I want to build a service that lets people access all their libraries from multiple streaming services. Can't I automate all the backend with Nango and just build a front-end around it? If yes, wouldn't it be just rebranding Nango? If not, it would be nice to clarify in the docs.
My point is that if there is no clear boundary, it's too risky for me to try this product even if it's open-core. For Elastic, their boundary is "database as a service" but I don't see anything similar in your license.
While I understand Elastic's goal of preventing other companies from just rebranding Elasticsearch and selling it as it is, I would probably use Nango as it is and build a front-end layer on top of it for my side projects as I thought this is the main use-case. Can you elaborate more on the license?