Question is, how many of us would even know about human slavery in Vietnam without the Internet? I grew up when people got their news from whatever the networks chose to squeeze into 30 minutes of primetime news (Jennings, Brokaw, and Rather at their peak), and from the morning paper which varied in quality around the country.
Society as a whole is much better informed now, yet a handful of rent-seeking assholes are running a scorched earth campaign to protect their obsolete sacred cows, potentially at the expense of all of society being better informed about what matters in the world.
If you can vote for both, by all means do it. But if you have to choose one or the other, then I'd argue it's not so black and white which is more important to human life and liberty.
Society as a whole is much better informed now, yet a handful of rent-seeking assholes are running a scorched earth campaign to protect their obsolete sacred cows, potentially at the expense of all of society being better informed about what matters in the world.
If you can vote for both, by all means do it. But if you have to choose one or the other, then I'd argue it's not so black and white which is more important to human life and liberty.