Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Surely companies should want an active relationship with the developers of their most important and fundamental projects as well.

This sets up a false dichotomy. We _do_ have active relationships with the developers of our most important and fundamental projects.

> establish a business relationship to satisfy what open source licenses leave lacking

We do this. We pay on contract for work we need. This is separate from that.

> the results they are hoping for

The result we are hoping for at a company level is to give a more-or-less fair amount of money in return for the value we have received over the past year from sponsorship-seeking Open Source maintainers. I think of this as IOR instead of ROI—we are paying for value already received. This result is achieved. :)

Our hypothesis is that through social validation we can encourage other companies to follow suit, and if we're successful enough this could create opportunities that don't exist now. The $25k/yr scenarios you describe would be the bottom rung of this. FOSSFunders.com is where we're pursuing this. Wish us luck! :)




To be clear, I’m not criticizing, I think this is wonderful and good leadership. I’m just painting the larger picture for other readers. Sentry’s initiative is a good example that other companies can follow, I just want to make sure we don’t give the impression accidentally that this is a whole solution.

Super glad to hear that there are business relationships being established where needed. That helps strengthen the ecosystem.

So, yes absolutely, good luck!!


Fair enough. We could do better at telling the larger story. Thanks for the nudge! Cheers! :^)




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: