> Research and curiosity a miles away from “get instantly rich” and “solution in search of a problem” we’ve seen in crypto.
And what the original comment boils down to is “let’s not make LLMs and transformers solutions in search of problems, let’s not try to fit them to solve everything”. It seems you might agree.
My issue with the response has nothing to do with specific technologies, but that it painted another view as having an agenda (fear). That is the generic defence. You take something you believe and then say those who disagree do so due to <negative connotation>.
By the way, this is not the point but there are plenty of “solution in search of a problem” and “get instantly rich” (including full-on scams) cases in the current wave of AI.
And what the original comment boils down to is “let’s not make LLMs and transformers solutions in search of problems, let’s not try to fit them to solve everything”. It seems you might agree.
My issue with the response has nothing to do with specific technologies, but that it painted another view as having an agenda (fear). That is the generic defence. You take something you believe and then say those who disagree do so due to <negative connotation>.
By the way, this is not the point but there are plenty of “solution in search of a problem” and “get instantly rich” (including full-on scams) cases in the current wave of AI.