Is this one of those things where the previous leadership does something awful (retroactively change pricing schema), then they quickly enact new leadership to distance themselves from their actions?
Well, the transition in leadership is uncommon but they don’t officially give us a reason, so we’re left to speculate until someone inside gives us more info.
But from a purely speculative standpoint, it seems very possible that they were ousted because of the pricing debacle. I could see a world where the stakeholders aren’t thrilled with the damage the pricing changes did to their brand and took action.
