I'm confused, what are you suggesting? That Rust hits a global sweet spot already, the complainers are struggling because they are holding it wrong, and there shouldn't be an attempt to change anything?
I think I was clear - that the critiques are overblown and that these problems aren't nearly as significant as portrayed. Sure, there may be some "holding it wrong" going on, idk. A couple of blog posts aren't really representative of the overall feeling from devs like myself - that things are more or less fine.
As for changing things, I wouldn't really change any issues brought up here. I'd like to see some things smoothed out, like async traits, tooling to identify hot loops that are blocking without yielding, and things like that. Otherwise, nope, working as intended as far as I'm concerned.
I'm confused, what are you suggesting? That Rust hits a global sweet spot already, the complainers are struggling because they are holding it wrong, and there shouldn't be an attempt to change anything?