Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"""The Bulletin provides a forum for information exchange throughout the criminal justice community. Readers consist mostly of midlevel to executive managers in agencies of various sizes worldwide."""


And those will now think that LARPers who want privacy are terrorists? I don't see how this is a good way to separate LARPing from terrorism. It is scary to think that law enforcement thinks that people who want privacy are terrorists.


This is not "find larpers, check privacy, find crime"

Its "find crime, they claim larping, check behavior to verify"


The whole point is to tell the difference between "find larpers" and "find crime", so the rest of those points doesn't say anything. They found some people who did something suspicious, that is point 1, the next step is this document to help tell the difference.


That is what I said.


You said crime was found, there is no innocence possible in your scenario. That makes it fundamentally different from what I described.


Sorry. "Find evidence of a crime"


This article is about how to test the genuineness of claims of LARPing by people suspected of attempting to overthrow governments. If you don't have the precondition of armed bandits circling your seat of government, then the article is of no relevance.


The article is of relevance to anyone who is affected by criminal justice system. This is literally an article on how the law should be interpreted by federal law enforcement.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: