Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Embarrassing that the author is a professor and didn’t bother making a proper argument.

People are people. Your argument is strong enough without the ad hominem.



It's not an ad hominem. OP is saying that the person's entire job in writing such an essay is to think and make intelligent arguments about this particular area, and they have failed to do so in an obvious and silly way.

It's just like saying "embarrassing that $person is a firefighter and set their home on fire playing with matches" would not be an ad hominem.

An ad hominem would be: "embarassing that $person is a Harvard grad, making such an argument.", or "of course, we can expect such reasoning from someone writing an article for $publication"


Actually, an ad hominem is when you try to discredit an argument somebody made by attacking that person.

The example you cite seems closer to attacking a person based on their arguments being (perceived or claimed to be) bad. If you say "embarrassing an XY grad would make such a stupid argument" it will only discredit the argument if I believe XY graduates are stupid (I guess the $publication example aims at this). Meanwhile, if I don't see why the argument is bad and don't have a bad opinion of XY, your statement is entirely unconvincing.


Hard agree. If anything, it’s an ad-professorium attack using the discredited argument as (purported) evidence.

Convincingly discrediting someone’s argument and then marveling that such error or oversight would emanate from someone so credentialed is not ad-hominem. Ad-hominem is the exact reverse.

Let us at least strive to keep our error classification and biases in good order.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: