Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

To quote the tweet:

> We have heard you. We apologize for the confusion and angst the runtime fee policy we announced on Tuesday caused. We are listening, talking to our team members, community, customers, and partners, and will be making changes to the policy. We will share an update in a couple of days. Thank you for your honest and critical feedback.

Let's break that down.

* DARVO - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARVO

You might say "Gas lighting" or "Deflection" in colloquial terms, and then understand the 2nd sentence:

> We apologize for the confusion and angst the runtime fee policy we announced on Tuesday caused.

That is saying that we are confused, and experiencing angst. As if we do not appreciate or understand the harmless thing. It's an apology at first, but then simultaneously degrades the audience as "confused", as if the audience did not understand the message.

Nextly, we see:

> We are listening, talking to our team members, community, customers, and partners, and will be making changes to the policy.

Take note the ordering of the 2nd list, and the weird run-on of the first list into the second. They are "Listening" and "Talking" to... The author of these words seems to the type of mind who wants to emphasis the fakeness first, but then minimize the reality last. Read that as "we are not listening, and will be talking to...", and the 2nd list goes the same way, pretty much ignore all the stuff up-front, and look at the last part where is says "partners". Full translation: "We are talking to our Partners, while monitoring dissident employees (some of whom called in bomb threats to the SF office earlier this week), identifying defectors in the influencer community, and auditing belligerent customer accounts likely to evade the licensing.

> Thank you for your honest and critical feedback.

Again, look at the last part of the writing... the writer does that, they probably mentally compartmentalize the bad news, and mention last. We are reading a not so masterful manipulator, somebody not quite proficient in their personality disorder, whatever that might be... Borderline, Sociopath, Narcissist, or whatever....




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: