> So how does one anecdotal point show that ChatGPT is more reliable than human doctors? If that is not the point to these celebrations, mentions, etc that both of you are doing then I can assume that it is far from the case then, unless you have a direct answer to that question?
No one is saying chatGPT is more reliable then Doctors. Please keep this discussion grounded in reality.
> So how does one anecdotal point show that ChatGPT is more reliable than human doctors? If that is not the point to these celebrations, mentions, etc that both of you are doing then I can assume that it is far from the case then, unless you have a direct answer to that question?
It doesn't. It shows chatGPT beating 17 doctors in this case. That has NOTHING to do with reliability and that assumption is a big leap of logic you, and only you, are making.
> So obviously as expected you still need human doctors regardless, as LLMs are opaque black-boxes which have a lack of transparent reasoning with unpredictable outputs. Thus how does that mean it can be used for medical advice or not?
Yes, of course. That doesn't mean chatGPT couldn't be incorporated into doctors work flow and provide tangible value. No one is saying chatGPT should replace doctors.
Stop arguing against made up air castles. You are only fooling yourself.
No one is saying chatGPT is more reliable then Doctors. Please keep this discussion grounded in reality.
> So how does one anecdotal point show that ChatGPT is more reliable than human doctors? If that is not the point to these celebrations, mentions, etc that both of you are doing then I can assume that it is far from the case then, unless you have a direct answer to that question?
It doesn't. It shows chatGPT beating 17 doctors in this case. That has NOTHING to do with reliability and that assumption is a big leap of logic you, and only you, are making.
> So obviously as expected you still need human doctors regardless, as LLMs are opaque black-boxes which have a lack of transparent reasoning with unpredictable outputs. Thus how does that mean it can be used for medical advice or not?
Yes, of course. That doesn't mean chatGPT couldn't be incorporated into doctors work flow and provide tangible value. No one is saying chatGPT should replace doctors.
Stop arguing against made up air castles. You are only fooling yourself.