I've edited my comment to hopefully clarify that I am talking about the piece and not accusing the author himself.
My problem with the piece is that it reads like the usual knee-jerk pro-Linux FUD that typically originates around scare words like "Microsoft", "secure boot" and "UEFI".
My problem with the piece is that it reads like the usual knee-jerk pro-Linux FUD that typically originates around scare words like "Microsoft", "secure boot" and "UEFI".