Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Shouldn’t the chemical reaction be: 4 H2O + 3 CO2 <=> C3H8 + 5 O2


The reaction described in the paper doesn't have spare oxygen on either side, presumably because oxygen has a habit of destroying catalysts and being explosive when mixed with hydrocarbons. Instead hydrogen is required.


(Not having access to the paper)

So are you saying the reaction is

10 H2 + 3 CO2 <=> C3H8 + 6 H2O

Of course, neither this nor the reaction mentioned in the parent comment matches up with the diagram in the linked article which says "water + CO2 => propane + water", which well, doesn't make sense..


So you would need to have two separate electrolyzing processes, one that isolates H2 and one that runs this operation? How much energy would have to go into the first one?

I’m asking because a lot of the demand for hydrocarbon that I see mentioned is for processes that have more efficient, non-hydrocarbon equivalents.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: