Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're projecting.

That "it doesn't reason" in your meaning seems to depends on unknowable suppositions that are a quasi-metaphysical characterisation of the process of reasoning.

I'm defining reasoning from a set of observable outputs. The Chinese room isn't a thing.



You presuppose that it reasons AND humans reason.


There being "no such thing as reasoning" is an amusing cop-out.


That's not my point at all




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: