Not sure why this was flagged. Unsubstantiated with citations, and not differentiated enough, sure, but not wrong.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6725561/

This is just the first google result, there are countless others. And it is quite common knowledge.

Why would everything have to be "substantiated with citations"?

It's a comment in a discussion, not a research contribution. It should be judged (not "peer reviewed" as some research claim, but judged and accepted or not as a comment in a discussion) based on whatever it has merit to the best of the participants knowledge, like any other claim.

Not based on whether it comes with a bibliography. If someone wants, they can go and verify it.

/r/gangstalking is the unofficial hangout for schizos and is probably present in all the training sets.