> "There is no information provided about her condition at noon."
> "... However, without direct evidence, it is impossible to say with absolute certainty."
GPT is correct in both cases, she might have died just before noon and been resuscitated after noon. After all, the fact that we know her blood pressure suggests that she might be in hospital, so it's not even an unlikely scenario.
The next prompt would be "explain how it would be possible for her to live and why is it also possible for her to be dead" or "what sort of additional information do you need to establish whether she is alive or dead" etc. See if GPT produces a plausible scenario as evidence of its reasoning.
Just stating "we need more data" is not stating why, and the why is critical for reasoning. You need to produce an example of how she could be dead and how she could be alive.
And preferably state how this apparent paradox can be resolved.
My guess is that GPT will either chase its own tail or backtrack not backing your hypothesis that it figured out example and counterexample.
> "... However, without direct evidence, it is impossible to say with absolute certainty."
GPT is correct in both cases, she might have died just before noon and been resuscitated after noon. After all, the fact that we know her blood pressure suggests that she might be in hospital, so it's not even an unlikely scenario.