Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

In fairness, further on in the paper, the author does note that the quoted extract is irrelevant, by saying "we need not aim for an oracle anyway. Humans are not oracles either…"



It doesn't surprise me that he walks back this opening statement, but it reveals how his exploration is biased.


I read the opening statement as an acknowledgment of how the expectations should not be limitless anyway.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: