>This is comparing the mean driverless incident rate to the mean human driver incident rate. This is disingenuous, since a small minority of human drivers cause the vast majority of incidents, thereby severely inflating the mean human incident rate.
Why is this disingenuous? Unless you're also for advocating for banning those top 10% of drivers from driving, you can't just cherry pick only the good drivers.
Why is this disingenuous? Unless you're also for advocating for banning those top 10% of drivers from driving, you can't just cherry pick only the good drivers.