I know nothing of DLSS (I use AMD parts) but 100ms sounds extreme to me. Like way above playable. Did you try Nvidia's reflex experiment? At 85ms it feels like the mouse is stuck in tar. I read that the increase in aim precision was near 60% and often up to 80%(!) in the low Vs high latency.
I don't know what my current systems total latency is, but I use a mouse with custom internals and an LG OLED screen for the lowest input lag. The difference between 60 and 120 Hz is huge even with my at least low-ish input lag system.
This isn't meant as a criticism, as I stated I have no clue how DLSS feels and I quite enjoy playing games on my PS5 too (with LG OLD and VRR), but the 100ms just sounded off to me.
Actually, before posting I just had a quick look at Nvidias article. Their example of worst system latency was 77ms and the best is 12ms.
I don't know what my current systems total latency is, but I use a mouse with custom internals and an LG OLED screen for the lowest input lag. The difference between 60 and 120 Hz is huge even with my at least low-ish input lag system.
This isn't meant as a criticism, as I stated I have no clue how DLSS feels and I quite enjoy playing games on my PS5 too (with LG OLD and VRR), but the 100ms just sounded off to me.
Actually, before posting I just had a quick look at Nvidias article. Their example of worst system latency was 77ms and the best is 12ms.
100 and I'd throw it out the window.