To points 1 and 2 this particular judge, amongst others, has been known to issue overly broad injunctions that reek of political bias.
The injunction is almost more the point of these cases.
If someone goes forum shopping, they have a decent chance of shutting down whatever Democratic policy they want until the injunction can be appealed. Or worse, a narrow injunction can conflict with a national injunction, which puts an administration in the position of choosing which binding injunction to follow. This recently occurred with an abortion drug [0].
The injunction is almost more the point of these cases.
If someone goes forum shopping, they have a decent chance of shutting down whatever Democratic policy they want until the injunction can be appealed. Or worse, a narrow injunction can conflict with a national injunction, which puts an administration in the position of choosing which binding injunction to follow. This recently occurred with an abortion drug [0].
[0] https://www.npr.org/2023/04/07/1159220452/abortion-pill-drug...