Oh I didn't realize that. Maybe similar teeth, different dragon. I'm cautious about Microsoft, but recently I'd have to say they've been a reasonable Linux community member - though if there are fewer larger balancing orgs - who knows.
> about Microsoft, but recently I'd have to say they've been a reasonable Linux community member
All it takes is to look around at what Microsoft is doing to gestures vaguely to see the writing on the wall for how Microsoft sees Linux.
Advertisements on the home screen? Advertisements on the every screen? Login darkpatterns? Configuration resets on updates? Forceful browser choices? Forced updates? UEFI shenanigans? Boot manager shenanigans?
Yup, the windows OS (as opposed to Linux) is where they have no counterbalancing reason to not pursue darker patterns. So it's a window into unchecked tendencies.
Or you know, Microsoft is a giga-company with no singular goal (besides increasing revenue). Improving and “destroying” linux may be simultaneously goals to separate areas of the same company, and due to bureaucracy I really can’t take this conteos seriously.
>but recently I'd have to say they've been a reasonable Linux community member
LOL
Its amazing how easy it is. I guess if you spend your entire history being a shitty company and then spend a couple of years pretending to be marginally less shitty then you can dupe a bunch of people.