Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_water_crisis

> An extensive lead service pipe replacement effort has been underway since 2016. In early 2017, some officials asserted that the water quality had returned to acceptable levels, but in January 2019, residents and officials expressed doubt about the cleanliness of the water. There were an estimated 2,500 lead service pipes still in place as of April 2019. As of December 8, 2020, fewer than 500 service lines still needed to be inspected. As of July 16, 2021, 27,133 water service lines had been excavated and inspected, resulting in the replacement of 10,059 lead pipes. After $400 million in state and federal spending, Flint has secured a clean water source, distributed filters to all who want them, and laid modern, safe, copper pipes to nearly every home in the city. Politico declared that its water is "just as good as any city's in Michigan."

"We fixed it" presumably is part of why Flint is a lower priority than combating Russian wars of expansionary aggression.

(The Ukraine war is, incidentally, a fascinatingly cheap way of kneecapping Russia. It's beyond the wildest wet dreams of the Cold Warriors in cost effectiveness.)



Ok, so you won't ever complain about a underfunded school or similar ever again?

Teachers make plenty, the IRS is well funded, everything is great?

Put another way: When the war is over we can expect tax cuts as we don't have any domestic priorities to spend it on right?


> Ok, so you won't ever complain about a underfunded school or similar ever again?

I think the wealthiest country the world can manage to fund both.


How can you say this while "the wealthiest country" still has people dying because they can't afford medication?


The evidence is to the contrary. After decades of war in the middle east our infrastructure is crumbling, poverty is on the rise, kids are living in homes with lead in the water and painted on the walls and we are still leaving our kids with a bill (national debt).


> The evidence is to the contrary.

That something is not done doesn't automatically prove it's due to e.g. Middle East, or giving really old stock to Ukraine. The US is more than capable of doing multiple things at the same time. Though, yeah, the infrastructure in the US is terrible and so on. It still doesn't prove that it's due to focussing on the military. E.g. the costs for medical care is way higher than any other country. It could've been done differently, but well, that's still not due to waging a war in the Middle East.


If they could do both at the same time, why haven't they? You might blame the opposite party but look more closely, did their voters get what they were asking for?

You vote for democrats to increase funding to social programs, they promise they will tax the rich to pay for them. The democrats never vote to raise the capital gains tax instead if they do anything they raise income taxes or introduce a "fine" to poor people who cant afford health insurance. They then fund ineffective programs that are later revealed to have a great deal of fraud and waste. They say they will fight healthcare costs but can't even get a bill to reimport drugs onto the floor. They'll do a Medicare for all vote but only when they are not in power so it won't go through.

Maybe you get disillusioned with that and decide to vote Republican. They say they cut taxes and they do nominally, but not without craving out even larger tax cuts for wealthy individuals. They fail to cut spending. Look at the most recent debt celing crisis, they immediately caved. Look at when they had a majority, no major spending cuts.

What do they have in common? War. They love wars. They get rich off wars. Let's not let them have any wars until they do what we want them to do at home. War is dessert, make them eat their dinner first.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: