> I really liked that before each chapter, ethics and a bit of historical context of each problems were discussed, and what questions should one ask themselves when waddling into those territories.
This is a great idea. I think more introductory books should try to give context into how the topics they're introducing relate to the field and the history thereof.
> it mentions Stanley Milgram's Small-world experiment (which as been debunked as pseudo-science)
This links to the wikipedia page, which mentions nothing about it being pseudo-science. There's a section on criticisms, but I don't see how the commenter reaches this conclusion
This is a great idea. I think more introductory books should try to give context into how the topics they're introducing relate to the field and the history thereof.
Glad I now know about this book!