In the other discussion of this topic, a lot of people said the lawyer should be disbarred, but personally I think people should be able to trust the tools marketed by trillion dollar tech companies, and a lot of the blame should be placed on Microsoft/OpenAI for overhyping ChatGPT and understating how likely it is to mislead.
And every response from ChatGPT should be preceded by a warning that it cannot be trusted.
Monty Python nicely addressed this, over 50 years ago.
> Mr. Hilton: Oh, we use only the finest juicy chunks of fresh Cornish ram's bladder, emptied, steamed, flavoured with sesame seeds, whipped into a fondue, and garnished with lark's vomit.
> Inspector: LARK'S VOMIT?!?!?
> Mr. Hilton: Correct.
> Inspector: It doesn't say anything here about lark's vomit!
> Mr. Hilton: Ah, it does, on the bottom of the box, after 'monosodium glutamate'.
> Inspector: I hardly think that's good enough! I think it's be more appropriate if the box bore a great red label: 'WARNING: LARK'S VOMIT!!!'
Really, it should open every conversation with “by the way, I am a compulsive liar, and nothing I say can be trusted”. That _might_ get through to _some_ users.
Humor aside I disagree. They are basically three types of people, the one who learns by reading, if you learn by observation, the rest just have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.
And every response from ChatGPT should be preceded by a warning that it cannot be trusted.