I don’t think I implied that all lawyers are like this?

Intended or not, the plural here, when discussing a single lawyer, left me with that impression:

"incompetence implies that lawyers require better technical education on LLMs"

Others may have a different take?

That should be read as "the presence of incompetence implies that those incompetent lawyers [...]." Sorry if you found the phrasing ambiguous.

(The only really important part of the original comment is the part about CLEs: we have an entire professional educational system that ought to be able to accommodate subjects like this.)

It should.