Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

At the end of the day, someone has to pay for it. Higher and higher salaries, more and more perks and benefits, less and less hours put into work.

Sure there is time savings in not commuting, but there are also time savings in face-to-face interactions, team spirit etc.

Instead of cooking some food and eat alone at home you can eat and discuss with colleagues or friends who work in the same area.

Instead of commuting people waste their time on social media, news and other junk before, during and after work. A commute via bus, train, subway, bicycle can often be productive or even relaxing versus taking the car. It's an often needed break between work-time and free-time. It's hard to make that break when working form home.




> Instead of commuting people waste their time on social media, news and other junk before, during and after work. A commute via bus, train, subway, bicycle can often be productive or even relaxing versus taking the car. It's an often needed break between work-time and free-time. It's hard to make that break when working form home.

You seem to be extending your own experience as if it applies to everyone equally, but it doesn't.

I find commutes neither productive nor relaxing. I do not need a break between work-time and free-time, I have an office space at home to provide that compartmentalization.


What even is this logic?

Wfh = internet addict?

Counter example

I end my work, get ready and head to the gym 10min later and 1h later im free

Meanwhile when commuting Id barely get to the home


I spent a decade working in an office park with no restaurants and only over priced cafeterias with low quality food. Everyone brought their lunch and usually ate in their office while on conference calls. My employer was responsible for the selection and hiring of the cafeteria management company.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: