Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I agree with all this, except for the part where he accurately described US media as state sponsored. The US state works for US corporations and US corporations own the media. Also, NPR does get some public money.



Less than 1% of NPR funding is from govt. Tesla and SpaceX get far more public money than NPR does. $7500 per vehicle subsidy. Lucrative NASA contracts.


SpaceX is a subsidy to the government now saving NASA hundreds of millions on launches.


Citation needed. Several sources at the air force are saying that launches are more expensive from SpaceX than other providers.


https://medium.com/geekculture/spacex-vs-nasa-cost-4fae45482...

I would be interested in what cost/kg other providers are referencing.


Delta and Soyuz rockets. NASA flights are horrendously expensive in comparison.


SpaceX is still about 10x cheaper than Soyuz: https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/space-launch-costs-gro...


I imagine the only people saying that are those benefiting from the ULA contracts.


Care to elaborate on how mid-level air force officers are "benefitting" from ULA contracts? A rocket is a rocket, buyers should be fairly vendor-agnostic.


Wikipedia says more like 11%, but it’s pretty complex. NPR produces programs that local stations play, and pay for. So while you might hear someone say they’re listening to NPR, they’re listening to a “member station,” that is paying NPR. They might get some money from federal grants, some from the corporation for public broadcasting, which is federally funded, some from member stations who get some federal grants. So I’m not sure if all the info you’d need to figure it out completely is public. I assume corporate sponsorship beats out federal funds by quite a bit though.


You're forgetting the corporate funding and that their editorial line parrots the state department.

Also, SpaceX deployed Starlink to provide guidance to (US provided) Ukrainian weapons. Field commanders said without it they wouldn't be in the fight. That sounds aligned with US foreign policy and statecraft to me.

They backpedaled after the use of the technology became so aggressive it would be reputationally damaging for starlink.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64579267


At least 14%. From their own page:

"Federal funding is essential to public radio's service to the American public and its continuation is critical for both stations and program producers, including NPR."

>7% Federal appropriations via CPB

>7% Federal, state, and local governments

Source: https://www.npr.org/about-npr/178660742/public-radio-finance...

Furthermore, NPR was built by public funding: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_for_Public_Broadca...

>Tesla and SpaceX get far more public money than NPR does.

And neither one is a media organization, so I'm not sure why that's even relevant.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: