> I think the margin of bat vs sh is a larger margin [...] the entire file is reread for each line
Ye agreed. Separation of data and code always was a mistake.
I wonder if this feature of bat files was like a thing once as a "best practice"? Practically, you should only append lines I guess. When I close my eyes, I can see a DOS batch file doing actual batch job processing, appending to itself and becoming a intertwined log and execution script.
Ye agreed. Separation of data and code always was a mistake.
I wonder if this feature of bat files was like a thing once as a "best practice"? Practically, you should only append lines I guess. When I close my eyes, I can see a DOS batch file doing actual batch job processing, appending to itself and becoming a intertwined log and execution script.