Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

covid misinformation is a conspiracy theory, suppressing idiocy is virtuous

"oh but if you allow a platform to suppress stupid shit then how do you know that they won't suppress other blah blah blah" judgment my bro, it is ok if things are subjective



I guess you're just not aware: https://reason.com/2021/06/04/lab-leak-misinformation-media-...

I'm not criticizing them for suppressing conspiracy theories, or even idiocy, I'm criticizing them for getting it wrong. Sure, it's fine if things are subjective, but it's also fine when hell rains down on you for being so seriously wrong.


this is a stupid article centered on a stupid premise, it diminishes everyone who comes in contact with it


I don't think my 13 year old nephew could've stated it any better. Thanks for your enlightening contributions during this thread.


don't put this on me, you're the one who linked reason.com non-ironically

be better


The kind of flamewar comments you posted to this thread will get an account banned on HN, so please don't do that. We want thoughtful, respectful, and above all curious conversation here.

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.

Edit: I took a look at your recent account history and saw two relevant things: (1) a lot of good comments, and (2) no other cases of flamewar. Thank you! That's great, and should make the current issue easy to avoid in the future.


I don't know what Reason's history is but you can look up the story at any other news outlet. The facts are the same.

Be better.


Please don't take HN threads further into flamewar hell. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

We've had to ask you this before.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


> covid misinformation is a conspiracy theory

I've been personally blocked on multiple forums for saying that we don't have enough information to say that there wasn't a lab leak.

I'm not making a leak claim, but stating as an expert that it's malpractice to characterize your assumptions as facts and without a long and detailed audit we could not know what we'd need to know to make a factual statement. No audit of the Wuhan lab had been done so we could not know what happened.

The government pressured old-Twitter to ban people who pointed out this fact.

> suppressing idiocy is virtuous

Are you applying to have your account blocked then? Because what I'm saying is tautological.

> judgment my bro, it is ok if things are subjective

For your opinion, sure. For policy, no. If we can't attempt to objectively show that something is wrong we can't claim to be censoring misinformation.


it's a good thing that everyone who holds any amount of power is always purely, perfectly virtuous and altruistic in their judgement—if this wasn't the case, that sure would complicate things, wouldn't it?


Please don't take HN threads further into flamewar hell. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

We've had to ask you this before.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Edit: it looks like you've been using HN primarily for political and ideological battle. That's not allowed here, regardless of what you're battling for or against. We ban accounts that cross this line (for more explanation see https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...), so please stop doing this.


yeah that is definitely a requisite assumption of my position

for the same reason we don't allow governments to enact laws or provide any kind of justice system, because there is no way to guarantee they will be always perfectly correct

yes sir


Please don't take HN threads further into flamewar hell. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: