Thanks. I think it's a serious risk, especially when weighed against the effectiveness of some boosters. The second original booster was nearly useless, so the risk/reward ratio was much higher than that of the original shots.
But because this side-effect information is being suppressed, millions of people were denied the right to assess that ratio. I would never have gotten that second booster had I been apprised of this risk.
People have the option to wear highly effective masks that protect both them and others in risky situations if they don't want shots. I was denied the info to make an informed choice, and there's no excuse for that.
But because this side-effect information is being suppressed, millions of people were denied the right to assess that ratio. I would never have gotten that second booster had I been apprised of this risk.
People have the option to wear highly effective masks that protect both them and others in risky situations if they don't want shots. I was denied the info to make an informed choice, and there's no excuse for that.